27 Nov 2016 at 23:55
After Brexit and the election of Donald Trump I have noticed a worrying trend in the use of language by the left, and it’s potentially quite insidious. The left are now trying to define anyone right of Tony Blair as a ‘far right’, or Alt right, or a far right extremist. Or a fascist. Even the normally mild-mannered and sensible Jason Cowley, editor of the New Statesman, describes Donald Trump as a neo-fascist. They are also trying to appropriate the word populism and declare it ‘a bad thing’, and associate it with people they disapprove of. Apparently only semi-fascists are populist. I’ve never subscribed to the theory that populism is necessarily a bad thing. I mean, how dare a politician come up with a policy that appeals to the masses. What they mean is that a policy that appeals to the masses by the Islington elites disapprove of, must of itself be a bad thing. In my experience, it’s often a very good thing. Oh dear. Does that make me a fascist? The trouble is that people who use that word willy-nilly often haven’t got the faintest idea what it actually means. The left associate the word ‘fascism’ with the far right, whereas anyone who has studied fascism will know it has just as much [some would say more] in common with the left as it does with the right.
It seemed to come as a surprise to most that during the Autumn Statement Philip Hammond was able to display a sense of humour. Anyone who has ever met him will tell you that he can be quite funny and usually has a twinkle in his eye. If he had been able to put his funny side on public display more often, I suspect he would perhaps have been better placed to stand in this summer’s Conservative leadership contest.
This autumn has been a great one for political books. I’ve just finished reading Ken Clarke’s memoir KIND OF BLUE and am making a start on Tim Shipman’s account of the EU referendum, ALL OUT WAR. My problem is that I don’t have a lot of time to read for pleasure because my job at Biteback Publishing means that reading author manuscripts has to take priority. This means that sometimes it takes me a couple of months to finish a book that I read for pleasure, as I only do that just before I go to sleep. Often I only manage a couple of pages before the Sandman comes. Quite often I wake up at 4am with the light on and still holding the book open at the page I was at when I fell asleep. I have piles and piles, shelves and shelves of books that remain unread, and will probably do so for many years to come. Whenever I look at those books, retirement becomes an all to appealing prospect.
On Wednesday Thomas Mair received a whole life tariff for the murder of Labour MP Jo Cox. Let’s not beat around the bush, this wasn’t an ordinary murder, it was a pre-planned terrorist murder. It wasn’t just the callous murder of a mother of two children, it was an attack on the state. It was an attack on our democracy. That’s why I think a whole life sentence was the right one. Personally, I think too few of these are handed out. On the same day Stephen Port was found guilty of murdering four young, gay men. Maybe he will get a whole life tariff, maybe he won’t. But he certainly should. It’s astonishing that there are only 65 people in UK prisons serving a proper whole life sentence. As Thomas Mair joins the likes of Ian Brady and the Yorkshire Ripper I do wonder whether our murder laws need reform. Most other countries have degrees of murder. Surely the murder of an MP has to be considered differently to the murder of a someone during a robbery. I am not saying that one human life is worth more than another, but the murder of a police officer or an MP surely has to be treated by society in a different way.